
zeitlich
Category: Heidegger - Termos originais
Submitter: mccastro
zeitlich
temporal [STMSCC]
temporel [ETEM]
temporal [BTJS]
NT: Temporal, temporality (zeitlich, Zeitlichkeit) of Da-sein, 17-19, 38fn, 100fn, 234-235, 303-305, 321fn, 326-354, 356-357, 359-360, 363-377, 379, 381-382, 385-386, 388-389, 391-393, 396-397, 404-428, 435-437; authentic, 304, 327, 329, 331, 338, 348, 373, 385, 410, 414; inauthentic, 304, 326, 329, 331, 391, 424; ecstatic, 38fn, 100fn, 329, 331, 356, 366, 369, 388, 393, 408, 426, 437; horizonal, 369, 388, 393, 420, 426; ecstatic-horizonal 426; primordial, 325-331 (§ 65), 349 (of taking care), 436, et passim enables transcendence, § 69c. See also Clearing; Ecstatic unity; Horizon; Temporalität; Temporalizing; Transcendence [BTJS]
Zeitlichkeit (temporality) - Having invoked the “rhythms” of the living self in having itself in its origin in the self-world and having formalized its movement into a triple-sensed intentionality, Heidegger concludes WS 1919-20 [GA58] by noting, in passing, that such motivated rhythms must be comprehended in terms of Bergson’s distinction between objective cosmic time and concrete duration. The term “temporality” is first used in SS 1920 [GA59] in contrast with the “supratemporal” apriori, based on the stereotypical distinction, in the then prevalent argument against psychologism by Husserl and the neo-Kantians, between supratemporal judicative content and judicative actualization through cognitive processes “in time.” But instead of such an “objective” temporality or even the “pure” temporality of Husserl’s “original phenomenological time” of the stream of experience, Heidegger calls for an examination of the “time of the self-world” through historical Dasein’s continual relation to its own past. Temporality then becomes a formal indication of Christian life in WS 1920-21 [GA60], in order to determine the “actualization history” of life rather than its “object history.” First in Oct. 1922 (p. 13) is the specific temporality of human Dasein to be found by coming to terms with its impending death, which in turn would determine the basic sense of the historical. [511] The kairological temporality of Dasein in its contrast with the Temporalität of being does not clearly emerge until the opening pages of BT. [KisielBT:510]
Submitted on: Thu, 08-Jul-2021, 06:30